Comments on: Of Flavonoids, Cocoa, Brains And Bad Science https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/flavonoids-cocoa-brains-bad-science/ Home workouts, fitness, nutrition, diet and the rest. Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:32:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9 By: evilcyber https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/flavonoids-cocoa-brains-bad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-13877 Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:32:28 +0000 http://evilcyber.com/?p=17655#comment-13877 In reply to Dr. J.

And maybe the cunning, methinks 😉

]]> By: evilcyber https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/flavonoids-cocoa-brains-bad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-13875 Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:28:55 +0000 http://evilcyber.com/?p=17655#comment-13875 In reply to RTalons.

Exacty!

]]> By: evilcyber https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/flavonoids-cocoa-brains-bad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-13874 Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:28:05 +0000 http://evilcyber.com/?p=17655#comment-13874 In reply to Band3.

What hasn’t been done to standard deviations in the name of science! 😀

]]> By: Dr. J https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/flavonoids-cocoa-brains-bad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-13758 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:51:19 +0000 http://evilcyber.com/?p=17655#comment-13758 Thanks for this! I saw the headlines and thought it seemed exaggerated!

I love Harvard! I think just walking around the campus raises one’s IQ 🙂

]]> By: RTalons https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/flavonoids-cocoa-brains-bad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-13744 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 06:54:43 +0000 http://evilcyber.com/?p=17655#comment-13744 In reply to Band3.

Exactly.

“(5.6% ± 7.2% vs ?2.4% ± 4.8%; p = 0.001)”

What statistical test did they do? The variation is bigger than the actual number, by 1 to 2 fold! Wonder how that got past reviewers…

]]> By: Band3 https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/flavonoids-cocoa-brains-bad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-13733 Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:06:01 +0000 http://evilcyber.com/?p=17655#comment-13733 Just gotta love those standard deviations….

]]>