evilcyber.com
  • Home
  • Workouts
    • Home Workout Plans
    • How To Build Muscle
    • How To Get Toned
    • Home Workout Equipment
    • Advanced Workout Topics
    • Other Workout Programs
    • Important Workout Lingo
    • Recommendable Books
  • Cardio
    • What Is Cardio?
    • How To Start Cardio
    • Home Cardio Exercises
    • Cardio Or Weights First?
    • Best Time For Cardio
    • Does Cardio Burn Muscle?
    • Cardio On Empty Stomach?
    • HIIT – Doing It Right
    • Cross-Training
  • Weight Loss
    • The Secret To Weight Loss
    • Gain Muscle And Lose Fat?
    • Exercise And Weight Loss
    • Diet Reviews
    • Weight Loss Myths
    • Weight Loss Supplements
  • Nutrition
    • Healthy Nutrition Explained
    • Bodybuilding Nutrition
    • What Are Carbohydrates?
    • What Is Fat?
    • What Is Protein?
    • Nutrition For Cardio
    • Marathon Nutrition
    • Exercise On Low Carb
  • Supplements
    • 3 Supplements That Work
    • BCAA Supplements
    • Beta-Alanine
    • Creatine
    • Dextrose Supplements
    • Energy Shots
    • Make Your Own Weight Gainer
    • Multivitamins
    • NAC
    • Testosterone-Boosters
  • The Rest

Nutrition

Organic Foods Overestimated

Many fans of organic foods strongly believe that they contain higher amounts of beneficial antioxidants. A Danish study recently came to a different conclusion.

Similar Amounts

Scientists from the Danish National Food Institute examined the amounts of  two types of antioxidants contained in conventionally and organically grown onions, carrots, and potatoes. According to their data, it cannot be said that organically grown food generally has higher amounts of these antioxidants.

Organic Still Better

This may put a needed damper on lobbying organic food with claims it cannot fulfill, as its true strengths lie elsewhere: Conventionally grown produce is often cultivated with pesticides and fertilizers that may harm health. One example here are the sometimes high amounts of nitrates they contain (PDF), which has led to the death of infants.

The usage of  genetically modified crops, whose potential dangers still aren’t researched very well,  present another problem with produce from this sector, that you will steer clear of when you go for organic food.

Just don’t expect it to do miracles.

Picture courtesy of Margo Conner.

Help me spread knowledge and share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Search

Subscribe to EC

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Most Read

  • strongman eugen sandow flexing his muscles The Eugen Sandow Workout You Can Do At Home
  • cemetery at night The Early Deaths Of Health And Nutrition Gurus
  • Eugen Sandow’s Strength And How To Obtain It
  • teen home workout Home Workout Plan For Teenagers
  • pills Why Bodybuilders Should Say No To NAC

Latest Comments

  • No comments

15 Comments

  1. Hamidabdul101 says:
    January 6, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    To me, i dont really mind if mine is GM or Organic or what. As long as it tastes good, has the protien, carbs etc… that i need, then im fine. Oh and as long as it doesnt kill me 😛

    Reply
    • evilcyber says:
      January 8, 2011 at 11:52 pm

      Well, I hope it won’t, Hamid! 😉

      Reply
  2. Canadianguy says:
    January 7, 2011 at 3:50 am

    hmm learn something everyday. Did not know people were claiming more antioxidants… Now I wonder if the message started as wild food (say wild blueberries which would be organic) have more anti oxidants than cultivated blueberries….

    Reply
    • evilcyber says:
      January 8, 2011 at 11:51 pm

      Possibly, yes. Basically organic food was heralded as better in every regard, which is overloading it with expectations.

      Reply
  3. Kael says:
    January 7, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    Based on what I’ve heard the pesticides damage the soil very badly and the soil is really the source of all the nutrients. So if the nutrient amount of the food is largely dependent on the quality of the soil, going organic won’t magically make the food more nutritious, it’s only beneficial for the quality of the soil. This means that the nutritional benefits are only seen after the micro-organisms of the soil have had time to recover from the pesticides.

    But then again the science seems to (at least for now) lean towards their being not much difference. But to play devil’s advocate one could give the argument that the studies (including that danish study) haven’t been conducted long enough to see the benefits. Whatever be the case though, it’s good to remember that the amount of nutrients is also dependent on many other things like weather conditions, storage conditions and freshness.

    But even though organic veggies wouldn’t have a nutritional difference with conventional ones, I have no doubt that organic meat and dairy is much much better since it doesn’t have all the growth hormones, antibiotics and the animals have been on a healthier diet. Plus again, organic food has less pesticides and is GM-free.

    Reply
  4. Band3 says:
    January 7, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    Well, it is not THAT simple. If you for instance take the same variety of for instance tomato it will indeed have the same ammount of vitamins, minerals etc. regardless if it is grown organically or conventionally, but (make it bold):

    a) It would be so only if said tomato was picked at the same stage of ripeness. If it is picked still green in Turkey and travels all the way to England it just tastes like water compared to a tomato of the same variety grown in your backyard which was picked from the plant ripe and juicy.

    b) Only a limited number of fruit and vegetable varieties are grown industrially. You know, the ones that are easy to grow, bear big good looking fruits and give big yields. And those varieties not necessarily have the best nutrition values. A friend of mine did a PhD on antioxidant content in old nearly “extinct” cherry varieties compared to values found in varieties commonly grown today. Well, let’s say the results were rather shocking…

    So to summarize…

    It is not a mater of organic or conventional. It is a matter of local production and plant variety.

    Reply
    • evilcyber says:
      January 8, 2011 at 11:45 pm

      Do you have a link to your friend’s thesis? I think that would be an interesting read!

      Reply
  5. Myschly says:
    January 7, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    Never heard this claim either. It’s not what organic HAS that appeals to me, it’s what it DOESN’T HAVE, chemicals!

    Reply
    • Kael says:
      January 7, 2011 at 5:03 pm

      The word “chemical” is too often misused, since water is also a chemical. As for pesticides, organic food isn’t necessarily free of all pesticides, only free of synthetic pesticides. The natural pesticides used sometimes in organic foods are of course much less harmful.

      Reply
      • evilcyber says:
        January 8, 2011 at 11:44 pm

        That is all in all what I was driving at when I wrote about stevia as a “natural” sweetener – a chemical is a chemical.

        Reply
      • Myschly says:
        January 11, 2011 at 4:37 pm

        It’s the same way as when people say “the gene for”. It’s a misuse of the word, but it’s how it’s talked in everyday language, so everyone knows what I mean.

        When I say chemicals when talking about food, I’m talking about added things, man-made often, that are detrimental to health.

        Apples have chemicals that age other fruit, but it’s not “chemicals”.

        Reply
  6. Band3 says:
    January 9, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    What about the term “organic”, then?. I am just eating an “anorganic” apple at the moment, lol.

    @Evilcyber
    I doubt a PhD thesis written in Slovenian would be much of a help to you ;). However, they published some articles on the topic, the most interesting being.

    http://www.ftb.com.hr/40/40-207.pdf

    The abstract summs it up quite well.

    …Total anthocyanin content (expressed as cyanidin-3-glucoside) ranged from 29 to 62 mg/100 g of pitted cherry fresh weight (FW), with the highest content observed in Petrovka, a local cultivar. Concentrations of neochlorogenic acid and 3′-p-coumaroylquinic acid ranged from 19.5 to 53.0 mg/100 g FW and from 7.5 to 50.6 mg/100 g FW, respectively. The relative amounts of these two phenolic acids varied widely between the cherry cultivars examined in this study.

    My comment: The “Petrovka” cultivar is more or less extinct since there are only a few trees left. The reason lies in low yields and scrawny fruits. Lambert and Bing are the stuff you normally find in the supermarket.

    Reply
    • evilcyber says:
      January 11, 2011 at 8:15 pm

      Yes, I admit, my Slovenian is a bit unsatisfactory! 😉

      Seriously, thanks! This goes to show that the higher yielding cultivar were given favor over those that actually taste better. A decision I think actually is not in the interest of the consumer – you might get more cherries cheaper, but what do they taste like?

      Reply
  7. 5nhalf says:
    March 24, 2011 at 4:54 am

    the only reason i buy organic is because its actually cheaper at the grocery store i live close to. ha

    Reply
    • evilcyber says:
      March 24, 2011 at 2:44 pm

      You are one lucky man! 🙂

      Reply

    What do you think?

    Click here to cancel reply.


    • About
    • Contact
    • Copyright
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    © Copyright 2023 — evilcyber.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Evilcyber.com uses cookies

    More info about these little buggers in the Privacy Policy.

    Close
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.