<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fda | evilcyber.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://evilcyber.com/tag/fda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://evilcyber.com</link>
	<description>Home workouts, fitness, nutrition, diet and the rest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>FDA Changes Nutrition Labels: Good Or Bad?</title>
		<link>https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/fda-changes-nutrition-labels/</link>
					<comments>https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/fda-changes-nutrition-labels/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evilcyber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbohydrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilcyber.com/?p=20744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For the first time in two decades the FDA wants to overhaul nutrition labels and place emphasis on calories and sugar. Will it help? The New Labels Examined When I first looked at them, the changes seemed unremarkable, but closer examination revealed some striking differences between the old and new food labels. To the left [&#8230;]</p>
The post <a href="https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/fda-changes-nutrition-labels/">FDA Changes Nutrition Labels: Good Or Bad?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://evilcyber.com">evilcyber.com</a>.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/fda-changes-nutrition-labels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Trans Fats Get Banned?</title>
		<link>https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/banning-trans-fats/</link>
					<comments>https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/banning-trans-fats/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evilcyber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trans fats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trans fatty acids]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilcyber.com/?p=19279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The FDA just announced it will try to ban trans fats from food production. But why are trans fats harmful, how can you avoid them and will the FDA be able to push through with this? What Are Trans Fats? Put simply, trans fats are poly- or monounsaturated fatty acids, which on a first glimpse [&#8230;]</p>
The post <a href="https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/banning-trans-fats/">Will Trans Fats Get Banned?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://evilcyber.com">evilcyber.com</a>.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://evilcyber.com/nutrition/banning-trans-fats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DMAA &#8211; Gone For Good?</title>
		<link>https://evilcyber.com/supplements/dmaa-ban/</link>
					<comments>https://evilcyber.com/supplements/dmaa-ban/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evilcyber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodybuilding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geranium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxyelite pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workout]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilcyber.com/?p=10639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like DMAA is gone for good, after supplement companies failed to produce any evidence proving the &#8220;naturalness&#8221; and safety of DMAA. What Is DMAA? DMAA is short for &#8220;dimethylamylamine,&#8221; and a stimulant related to amphetamine and ephedrine. It rose to fame when in 2006 a ban on using ephedrine as a dietary supplement [&#8230;]</p>
The post <a href="https://evilcyber.com/supplements/dmaa-ban/">DMAA – Gone For Good?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://evilcyber.com">evilcyber.com</a>.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://evilcyber.com/supplements/dmaa-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 16/64 queries in 0.053 seconds using Disk

Served from: evilcyber.com @ 2026-10-20 09:11:37 by W3 Total Cache
-->